You are browsing in:
Tag: existing practitioners

15 – Letter to Fred Bullock from Frederick Smith, 7 Mar 1920

Smith writes about various subjects including: rewriting the chapter on the muscular system for ‘Veterinary Physiology; writing a review of ‘Physiology of Farm Animals’ by T B Wood and F H A Marshall; Cambridge School of Agriculture; ‘Discovery’ journal[?]; English attitude to science; writing paper; Veterinary Surgeons Act 1881 Amendment Act 1920; existing unqualified practioners; Hobday acquiring a photograph of Gabriel Colin[?]; review of ‘Veterinary History of the War in South Africa’; …

16 – Letter to Fred Bullock from Frederick Smith, 8 Mar 1920

Smith writes regarding Bullock sending a draft document to him by mistake. He thanks Bullock for the ‘Edinburgh Review’, and mentions a man called Banbury who ‘hates us’ [the veterinary profession?]. Enclosures are mentioned, but not found at time of cataloguing.

17 – Letter to Fred Bullock from Frederick Smith, 9 Mar [1920]

Smith writes about various subjects including: the ‘Probe’; ‘Registered Men’ [existing practioners]; Smith rejected for election to Royal Society; sending copies of ‘Veterinary History of the War in South Africa’ for review; Bullock writing to Wilkinson; printers blocks of illustration of Gabriel Colin; Hobday; rewriting the chapter on the nervous system for Smith’s ‘Veterinary Physiology’.

21 – Letter to Fred Bullock from Frederick Smith, 18 Mar 1920

Smith writes regarding further information found about Samuel Butler and his work. He also mentions the Journal of Physiology, the Veterinary Surgeons Act (1881) Amendment Act 1920 and John Alcock…